[35] Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning at this Scripture, preached Jesus to him. [36] Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, “See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?” [37] Then Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” [38] So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him. [39] Now when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught Philip away, so that the eunuch saw him no more; and he went on his way rejoicing. [40] But Philip was found at Azotus. And passing through, he preached in all the cities till he came to Caesarea.1
Acts 22:16 - And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord.’5
The Roman Catholic and the Greek Orthodox churches, most Lutheran bodies, and many in the Church of England and the Protestant Episcopal church hold that baptism is the direct instrument of regeneration. Roman Catholics subscribe so strongly to this view that, accordingly, they also hold that all adults or infants who die unbaptized are excluded from heaven.6
As the 1640s gave way to the 1650s, more and more children of the earliest settlers failed to experience God’s grace in the same fashion as their parents, and hence they did not seek full membership in the churches. The problem became acute when these children began to marry and have children of their own. Under the Puritans’ Reformed theology, converted people had the privilege of bringing their infant children to be baptized as a seal of god’s covenant grace. Now, however, many of those who had been baptized as infants were not stepping forth on their own to confess Christ. Yet they wanted to have their children baptized. The Puritan dilemma was delicate: leaders wished to preserve the church for genuine believers, but they also wanted to keep as many people as possible under the influence of the church.7
Under the initial impulse to institute a pure church, the early New Englanders baptized children only if the parents were full communicant members of the church. But they soon faced a troubling question. What happened if those baptized children grew to adulthood but were never certifiably converted, even though they might be upstanding in other respects? Should the children of these half-way (baptized) church members be baptized? If God's covenant, as the Old Testament clearly said, extended to many generations, how could the grandchildren of the regenerate be denied the sacrament? After much debate, a synod of clergy declared in 1662 that children of half-way members could be baptized.8
The second and third generation saw a disquieting change of temper. The ideal of a church of the regenerate was faced with a condition of increasing indifference and the failure in many of evidence of conversion. A concession to this condition was made in the Half Way Covenant (1662), which without admitting the unregenerate to communion permitted the baptism of their children. The new plan called forth controversy but was at length generally adopted. It may have led to the weakening of the religious life that was characteristic of the early eighteenth century in New England as elsewhere.9
Although infant baptism was not as much a matter of course in New England as in Anglican England, it was by now regarded virtually as a right. For a respectable family to have unbaptized children or grandchildren would be a stigma.10
Endnotes:
1. | NKJV, (Acts:35-40) |
2. | Verse 37 is thought by some to be an later addition to the text. For example, the NAS places verse 37 in brackets and footnotes the verse indicating, “early manuscripts do not contain this verse.” |
3. | Ref-1054, Rom. 6:3 |
4. | Ref-1330, Rom. 6:3 |
5. | Compare with Ephesians 5:25-26. |
6. | Ref-0185, Baptism |
7. | Ref-0958, 48 |
8. | Ref-1348, 30. |
9. | Ref-1096, 341 |
10. | Ref-1348, 355 |
Sources:
NKJV | Unless indicated otherwise, all Scripture references are from the New King James Version, copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. |
Ref-0185 | Merrill F. Unger, R. K. Harrison and Howard Frederic Vos, New Unger's Bible Dictionary (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1988). |
Ref-0958 | Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1992). ISBN:0-8028-0651-1d. |
Ref-1054 | Newell, Romans Verse-by-Verse (n.p.: Word Search Corporation, 2007). |
Ref-1096 | John T. McNeill, The History and Character of Calvinism (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1967). |
Ref-1330 | Adam Clarke, Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible (n.p.: n.p., 1826). |
Ref-1348 | George M. Marsden, Jonathan Edwards: A Life (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003). ISBN:0-300-09693-3e. |