[16] Now while Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was provoked within him when he saw that the city was given over to idols. [17] Therefore he reasoned in the synagogue with the Jews and with the [Gentile] worshipers, and in the marketplace daily with those who happened to be there. [18] Then certain Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered him. And some said, “What does this babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign gods,” because he preached to them Jesus and the resurrection. [19] And they took him and brought him to the Areopagus, saying, “May we know what this new doctrine [is] of which you speak? [20] “For you are bringing some strange things to our ears. Therefore we want to know what these things mean.” [21] For all the Athenians and the foreigners who were there spent their time in nothing else but either to tell or to hear some new thing. [22] Then Paul stood in the midst of the Areopagus and said, “Men of Athens, I perceive that in all things you are very religious; [23] “for as I was passing through and considering the objects of your worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Therefore, the One whom you worship without knowing, Him I proclaim to you:”1
No city has ever seen such a forest of statues as studded the market-place, the streets and the sides and summit of the Acropolis of Athens.3
[The Reformation] was not the result of political imposition. It came from the discovery of the Word of God as originally written, . . . in the language of the people. Moreover, it could be read and understood, without censorship by the Church or mediation through the Church, as it was written to be read, as a coherent, cross-referring whole. Such reading produced a totally different view of everyday Christianity: the weekly, daily, even hourly ceremonies so lovingly catalogued by some Catholic revisionists are not there; Purgatory is not there; there is no aural confession and penance. Two supports of the Church's wealth and power collapsed. Instead, there was simply individual faith in Christ as Savior, found in the Scripture. That and only that ‘justified’ the sinner, whose root failings were now in the face of God, not the bishops or the pope.13
It has been observed that God created man in his image and man has returned the favor.15
Although the Indians had innumerable aetiological myths explaining, for example, how daylight began, why winter and summer alternate, why the raven is black and the sea-gull white, and why the chipmunk has stripes along its back, yet there were no true creation stories, no myths attributing to the will of a creator the genesis of stars and planets, earth and water, day and night, the seasons, animals and plants.16
The deities of the various tribes were most often attached to the sun, moon and the sea.17
The Humanist Manifesto II states, We find insufficient evidence for belief in the existence of a supernatural; it is either meaningless or irrelevant to the question of survival and fulfillment of the human race. As nontheists, we begin with humans not God, nature not deity.18
Endnotes:
1. | Acts 17:16-23, NKJV |
2. | God’s (plural): they may have mistaken the word for resurrection (Ἀνάστασιν [Anastasin] as being another god along with Jesus (Ἰησοὔν [Iēsoun]). |
3. | Ref-0038, AREOPAGUS |
4. | AFBW, Ancient Future and Blended Worship: What Are They and What’s the Difference?d |
5. | PFWP, Pattern for Worship Planninge |
6. | Some forms of ancient worship claim to be anchored in patterns revealed in the New Testament. “from its earliest days, the church practiced a two part order of worship: 1) the service of the word; 2) the service of the table. Both these expressions of worship are found in the New Testament. For example, Acts 2:42 records, “They devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching,” (the service of the word), “and to the breaking of bread” (the service of the table). Acts 20:7-11 also records a Sunday worship pattern of Word and Table. We also see images of Word and Table in Luke’s account of the Emmaus story (Luke 24:13-35). This basic pattern of word and table was firmly established by the second century.”5 While such a starting point seems reasonable, in practice it often leads to embracing practices which came much later and which lead far astray from what the New Testament reveals as the norm for Christian fellowship. |
7. | AFW, Gary Gilley, Review of Ancient-Future Worshipf by Robert Webber |
8. | “He calls for us to resist intellectual analysis that he believes stems from the Enlightenment and read the Bible as true but “not for truths” (p. 124).”7 |
9. | AFW, n.p. |
10. | “In [the mind of proponents of ancient-future worship] this has led to an individualistic form of Christianity in which people are concerned too much about redemption from sin and not enough about the rescue of fallen creation in the new heaven and earth (the new creation). This sounds like a useful adjustment in our theological thinking until we learn where it leads—the “redemption of the whole world” (p. 37).”9 |
11. | AFW, n.p. |
12. | “Webber is asking us to accept a form of Christianity not emerging from Scriptures but from the practices of men years after God had spoken His final word in the New Testament. This is the very approach that led to corruption in the “ancient” church and ultimately necessitated the Reformation. Why should we follow the same mistaken paths of the past?”11 |
13. | Ref-0230, 58 |
14. | Lev. 26:30; 2Chr. 33:3; Ps. 78:58; Isa. 65:7; Jer. 2:20; 3:6; 17:2-3; 19:5; Eze. 6:3; 16:16,24-25,31; 20:28; Hos. 4:13 |
15. | Ref-0447, Rev. 6:9 |
16. | Ref-1396, 188 |
17. | Ref-1407, 132 |
18. | Ref-0057, July/August 2002, p. 17 |
Sources:
Acts 17:16-23 | Unless indicated otherwise, all Scripture references are from the New King James Version, copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. |
Ref-0038 | John Walvoord and Roy. B. Zuck, The Bible Knowledge Commentary (Wheaton, IL: SP Publications, 1983). |
Ref-0057 | The Humanist Manifesto IIg |
Ref-0230 | David Daniell, William Tyndale: A Biography (London: Yale University Press, 1994). |
Ref-0447 | MacArthur, J. (1999). Revelation 1-11. Chicago: Moody Press. |
Ref-1396 | Diamond Jenness, Indians of Canada, 7th ed. (Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press, 1932, 1977). ISBN:0-8020-2286-8h. |
Ref-1407 | Rodger D. Touchie, Edward S. Curtis: Above the Medicine Line - Portraits of Aboriginal Life in the Canadian West (Toronto, Canada: Heritage House, 2010). ISBN:978-1-894974-86-8i. |