CrossLinks Topical Index - TO


To Live Is Christ, John Walvoord : Ref-0942
To Live Is Christ, John Walvoord - Logos-0549 - Walvoord, John, To Live Is Christ : Ref-0942
To Live Is Christ, John Walvoord - Walvoord, John, To Live Is Christ : Ref-0942
Tobit 3:7-8 : seven - brothers
Tobit 12:15 : angels - names of
today : salvation - today is day
today - salvation : salvation - today is day
Toe Hell and Back: Europe 1914-1949, Ian Kershaw : Ref-1410
Toe Hell and Back: Europe 1914-1949, Ian Kershaw - Kershaw, Ian, Toe Hell and Back: Europe 1914-1949 : Ref-1410
Toe Hell and Back: Europe 1914-1949, Ian Kershaw - Kershaw, Ian, Toe Hell and Back: Europe 1914-1949 - Kindle-0020 : Ref-1410
toes : ten - horns
toes - ten : ten - horns
Togarmah :

✪ Armenians. Turkey, Turkestan.


tola : tola - worm
tola - worm : Job 25:6; Ps. 22:6; Mat. 27:28

✪ Hebrew, crimson grub worm crushed to make scarlet dye for garments. "After the ram's skin had been tanned in the sumac, it is laid out on a table and a solution of the dye, made by boiling dud (worms) in water, is rubbed on. After the dye is try, the skin is rubbed with oil and finally polished." Ref-0066 15.1 (2002), p. 32.


toledoth : generations - toledoth
toledoth - generations : generations - toledoth
tomb : David - tomb ; Paul - death ; Rachel - tomb - mosque ; tomb - empty on Sunday; tomb - sealed
tomb - David : David - tomb
tomb - empty on Sunday : Luke 24:1; John 20:1
tomb - Paul : Paul - death
tomb - Rachel - mosque : Rachel - tomb - mosque
tomb - sealed : Mat. 26:63-66; Mat. 28:13
tombs : whitewashed
tombs - whitewashed : whitewashed
Tombs, Robert, The English and Their History : Ref-1509
Tombs, Robert, The English and Their History - Kindle-0022 : Ref-1509
Tombs, Robert, The English and Their History - Kindle-0022 - The English and Their History, Robert Tombs : Ref-1509
Tombs, Robert, The English and Their History - The English and Their History, Robert Tombs : Ref-1509
Tomkins, Stephen, Paul and His World : Ref-1253
Tomkins, Stephen, Paul and His World - Logos-0670 : Ref-1253
Tomkins, Stephen, Paul and His World - Logos-0670 - Paul and His World, Stephen Tomkins : Ref-1253
Tomkins, Stephen, Paul and His World - Paul and His World, Stephen Tomkins : Ref-1253
Tomlin, Graham, Luther and His World : Ref-1260
Tomlin, Graham, Luther and His World - Logos-0677 : Ref-1260
Tomlin, Graham, Luther and His World - Logos-0677 - Luther and His World, Graham Tomlin : Ref-1260
Tomlin, Graham, Luther and His World - Luther and His World, Graham Tomlin : Ref-1260
tongue : knee - bow ; speak - against God; tongue - gentle prevails; tongue - taming; tongue - weapon
tongue - against God : speak - against God
tongue - confess : knee - bow
tongue - gentle prevails : Pr. 25:15
tongue - taming : Ps. 5:9; Ps. 15:3; Ps. 17:3; Ps. 19:14; Ps. 39:1; Ps. 120; Ps. 141:3; Pr. 4:24; Pr. 10:19; Pr. 10:31-32; Pr. 11:12; Pr. 12:14; Pr. 13:3; Pr. 15:2; Pr. 15:4; Pr. 15:28; Pr. 17:27; Pr. 18:6-8; Pr. 18:21; Pr. 21:23; Pr. 29:20; Ecc. 5:2-3; Isa. 6:5; Isa. 6:7; Isa. 59:3; Mat. 12:34-35; Mat. 15:18; 1Pe. 3:10; Jas. 1:19; Jas. 1:26; Jas. 3:6; Jas. 3:8
tongue - weapon : Ps. 57:4; Ps. 59:7
tongues : cessationism ; dissolve - while standing; Holy Spirit - baptism - tongues authenticate ; Holy Spirit - intercedes; language - divided ; pythoness - tongues ; tongues - about God; tongues - appear mad; tongues - desired; tongues - do not forbid; tongues - ecstatic - modern origin ; tongues - edify self ; tongues - evangelization tool; tongues - fire; tongues - heard ; tongues - interpretation of ; tongues - interpreted by other; tongues - interpreted by self; tongues - irrational to speaker; tongues - known languages ; tongues - less important gift; tongues - not all speak with ; tongues - not understandable; tongues - pray in; tongues - sign to unbelievers ; tongues - singing in; tongues - speaking mysteries to God; tongues - spoken ; tongues - to God; tongues - two or three; tongues - unknown languages?
tongues - about God : Acts 2:5
tongues - appear mad : 1Cor. 14:23; 1Cor. 14:27
tongues - authenticate baptism of Holy Spirit : Holy Spirit - baptism - tongues authenticate
tongues - desired : 1Cor. 14:5
tongues - dissolve : dissolve - while standing
tongues - do not forbid : 1Cor. 14:39
tongues - ecstatic - modern origin :

"Southern California has always been a hub of Pentecostal influence. Although the first experiments with modern tongues-speaking took place in rural Kansas in 1901, Pentecostalism became an actual movement with the Azusa Street Revival of 1906, in a dilapidated section of downtown Los Angeles. The first spark was ignited in a private home some two miles northwest of the Azusa Street location. An African American holiness preacher named William J. Seymour was preaching to a small group that had broken away from a nearby church after the elders of that church rejected Seymour's teaching. Indeed, Seymour's knowledge of Scripture and his grasp of essential gospel truth seemed marginal at best. Even the Holiness Church Association with which he was affiliated (no paragon of evangelical orthodoxy itself) considered his teaching dangerously unbiblical. But Seymour was obsessed with the Pentecostal gifts, and one morning, after praying all night long, he began speaking in tongues. Pandemonium ensued. In the words of one observer, “They shouted three days and three nights. It was Easter season. The people came from everywhere. By the next morning there was no way of getting near the house.”" John MacArthur, Strange Fire Redux, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 85-93, p. 85. "Like Pentecostalism, the charismatic movement traces its roots to an unexpected event during Easter season in an unlikely location in Southern California. St. Mark's Episcopal Church in Van Nuys is just 16 miles as the crow flies from Azusa Street. In 1960 the church was a typical left-leaning Episcopalian parish, not evangelical in any historic sense. Both doctrinally and liturgically, it was at the opposite end of the spectrum from all the Pentecostal churches in Southern California. But on April 3 (Easter Sunday) in 1960, during the first of three morning services at St. Marks, Rector Dennis Bennett announced to his congregation that he had been baptized with the Holy Spirit and received the gift of tongues. The backlash among congregants and other staff members at St. Mark's was immediate and profound. One of Bennett's assistant priests peeled off his vestments and stormed out of the church in protest. Members of the vestry quickly met and demanded Bennett's resignation that very morning. The controversy escalated as the morning progressed, and during the third service, Bennett tendered his resignation. His presiding bishop later reassigned him to a church in Seattle." John MacArthur, Strange Fire Redux, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 85-93, p. 86.


tongues - edify self : 1Cor. 14:4; Jude 1:20 (?)

✪ Questionable: Jude 1:20 (?);


tongues - evangelization tool : Acts 2:8-11
tongues - fire : Acts 2:3
tongues - heard : Acts 2:6

"Those who . . . suggest that the miracle was in the hearing, not the speaking, must take into account that the speakers -- not the hearers -- were those on whom the Spirit came, or as Polhill puts it, “Indeed, if the miracle was in the crowd's hearing rather than in the believer's speaking, one wonders why it was even necessary for Luke to tell of the Spirit's coming so powerfully upon them.”" Donald G. McDougall, "Cessationism in 1_Cor_13:8-12", Ref-0164, 14/2 (Fall 2003) 177-213, pp. 190-191.


tongues - interpretation of : 1Cor. 12:10; 1Cor. 14:26-28

"Even when two or more different Pentecostal interpreters listen to the same audio recording of a tongues-speaker, their interpretations are totally different -- suggesting that the tongues themselves are not real languages that are capable of being translated." Nathan Busenitz, "The Gift of Tongues: Comparing the Church Fathers with Contemporary Pentecostalism", Ref-0167 Volume 17 Number 1, Spring 2006, 61:78, p. 70. "William Samarin, a linguistic professor at the University of Toronto, attended numerous Pentecostal and neo-Pentecostal meetings in several countries over a five-year period. At the end of his time, he concluded, ‘When the full apparatus of linguistic science comes to bear on glossolalia, this turns out to be only a facade language -- although at times a very good one indeed. For when we comprehend what language is, we must conclude that no glossa, no matter how well constructed, is a specimen of human language, because it is neither internally organized nor systematically related to the world man perceives. . . . Glossolalia is indeed a language in some ways, but this is only because the speaker (unconsciously) wants it to be like a language. Yet in spite of superficial similarities, glossolalia is fundamentally not language.’" Nathan Busenitz, "The Gift of Tongues: Comparing the Church Fathers with Contemporary Pentecostalism", Ref-0167 Volume 17 Number 1, Spring 2006, 61:78, pp. 71-72. ". . . Pentecostal interpretations can have a wide variety of meaning -- even when interpreting the same tongues-message. Kildahl, for example, had several Pentecostal interpreters listen to a single audio recording of glossolalia. After his experiment, he noted, ‘In no instances was there any similarity in the several interpretations. The following typifies our results: one interpreter said the tongue-speaker was praying for the health of his children; another that the same tongues-speech was an expression of gratitude to God for a recently successful church fund-raising effort.’ But when he confronted the interpreters with the inconsistencies, he was told that “God gave to one person one interpretation and to another person another interpretation.”" Nathan Busenitz, "The Gift of Tongues: Comparing the Church Fathers with Contemporary Pentecostalism", Ref-0167 Volume 17 Number 1, Spring 2006, 61:78, p. 77.


tongues - interpreted by other : 1Cor. 12:10
tongues - interpreted by self : 1Cor. 14:5; 1Cor. 14:13
tongues - irrational to speaker : 1Cor. 14:14-15
tongues - known languages : Acts 2:8; Acts 8:17 (?); Acts 10:46; Acts 19:6; 1Cor. 14:10; 1Cor. 14:21-22

✪ See tongues - unknown languages? "In spite of a relative de-emphasis placed on tongues-speaking by the church fathers (who speak of prophecy much more than they do of tongues), they are not altogether silent on the issue. In fact, their collective writings overwhelmingly suggest that they associate tongues-speaking with a supernatural ability to speak rational, authentic foreign languages. That proposition is directly supported by Irenaeus, Hippolytus, Hegemonius, Gregory of Nazianzen, Ambrosiaster, Chrysostom, Augustine, Leo the Great, and implied by others (such as Tertullian and Origen). Such a position is further strengthened by the fathers’ equation of the Acts 2 use of the gift with the Corinthian phenomenon (as well as their allusions to Isaiah 28:11 when discussing the NT gift). In several instances, they import their understanding of Acts 2 and Isaiah 28:11 (both of which speak of human foreign languages) into their interpretation of 1 Corinthians 12-14. Yet, they never suggest that the tongues experienced by the apostles at Pentecost were different from the tongues experienced by the Corinthian believers. Moreover, the patristic writers never hint at the possibility of two types of tongues-speaking." Nathan Busenitz, "The Gift of Tongues: Comparing the Church Fathers with Contemporary Pentecostalism", Ref-0167 Volume 17 Number 1, Spring 2006, 61:78, pp. 62-63. "This truth [1Cor. 14:10] rules out the idea that there are valid languages which use only meaningless gibberish." Ref-1307, p. 286. "One thing we can see from this Old Testament quote [1Cor. 14:21] is that the tongues described there were actual foreign languages. They were not simply gibberish, but they were real human languages that had meaning to those who spoke them." Ref-1307, p. 291. "As Thomas C. Edwards explains, “The universal interpretation of the older expositors [i.e. the church fathers], with the exception of [the Montanist] Tertullian, appears to have been that the gift of tongues consisted in the power to speak foreign languages, without learning them in the ordinary way” (cf. Thomas C. Edwards, A Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians [Hamilton, Adams & Co., 1885; reprint: Minneapolis: Klock & Klock, 1979], 319)." Nathan A. Busenitz, Are Tongues Real Foreign Languages? A Response to Four Continuationist Arguments, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 63-84, p. 66n12. "Throughout church history the gift of languages was ubiquitously considered to be the supernatural ability to speak authentic foreign languages that the speaker had not learned. In the early church, the writings of Hippolytus, Hegemonius, Gregory of Nazianzus, Ambrosiaster, Chrysostom, Augustine, Leo the Great, and others support this claim. . . . Augustine (354–430) noted that the gift was called the “gift of languages” because it illustrated the fact that the gospel would spread throughout all the languages of the world: In the earliest times, “the Holy Ghost fell upon them that believed: and they spoke with tongues,” which they had not learned, “as the Spirit gave them utterance.” These were signs adapted to the time. For there behooved to be that betokening of the Holy Spirit in all tongues, to show that the Gospel of God was to run through all tongues over the whole earth. That thing was done for a be-tokening, and it passed away. [Augustine, Homilies on the First Epistle of John, 6.10. NPNF, First Series, 7:497–98. The English was slightly updated for readability.]" Nathan A. Busenitz, Are Tongues Real Foreign Languages? A Response to Four Continuationist Arguments, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 63-84, p. 66. "Interestingly, some early Pentecostals not only spoke in tongues, they also wrote in tongues, and photographs of their writings were published by local newspapers. But their writings bore no resemblance to genuine foreign languages. The realization that modern tongues did not produce real languages led to a shift in the way later Pentecostals and neo-Pentecostals defined glossolalia." Nathan A. Busenitz, Are Tongues Real Foreign Languages? A Response to Four Continuationist Arguments, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 63-84, p. 68 "When professional linguists study modern glossolalia, they conclude that contemporary tongues bear no resemblance to true human language. After years of extensive research, University of Toronto linguistics professor William Samarin wrote: When the full apparatus of linguistic science comes to bear on glossolalia, this turns out to be only a façade of a language—although at times a very good one indeed. For when we comprehend what language is, we must conclude that no glossa, no matter how well constructed, is a specimen of human language, because it is neither internally organized nor systematically related to the world man perceives." Nathan A. Busenitz, Are Tongues Real Foreign Languages? A Response to Four Continuationist Arguments, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 63-84, pp. 68-69. "To cite Thomas Edgar once more: There are verses in 1 Corinthians 14 where foreign language makes sense but where unintelligible ecstatic utterance does not (e.g. v. 22). However, the reverse cannot be said. A foreign language not understood by the hearer is no different from unintelligible speech in his sight. Therefore, in any passage where such ecstatic speech may be considered possible, it is also possible to substitute a language not familiar to the hearers. In this passage there are no reasons, much less the very strong reasons necessary, to depart from the normal meaning of glossa and to flee to a completely unsupported usage. [Thomas Edgar, Satisfied by the Promise of the Spirit, 147]" Nathan A. Busenitz, Are Tongues Real Foreign Languages? A Response to Four Continuationist Arguments, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 63-84, p. 83. "The languages spoken at Pentecost are listed in Acts 2:9–11. Without exception, they were Gentile languages. Jews from all over the world were present in the city of Jerusalem. They had never heard God being praised in a Gentile language. The language of worship was Hebrew, exclusively. Even in the Dispersion, praise to YHWH was always offered in the sacred language. So when the apostles began speaking Gentile languages, the people of Jerusalem were hearing something completely new and shocking. The meaning was unmistakable: this was a declaration that God was turning from an apostate, Christ-rejecting nation to open the way of salvation for the wider world. Speaking in tongues signified that “the times of the Gentiles” (Luke 21:24) had begun." John MacArthur, Strange Fire Redux, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 85-93, p. 90. Questionable: Acts 8:17 (?);


tongues - languages - introduced : language - divided
tongues - less important gift : 1Cor. 12:10; 1Cor. 12:28; 1Cor. 13:1; 1Cor. 14:1-5; 1Cor. 14:19
tongues - not all speak with : 1Cor. 12:13; 1Cor. 12:30

✪ All are baptized, not all speak with tongues. "The patristic writings further evidence that all Christians did not speak in tongues. Not only did none of the church fathers claim to speak in tongues personally, they consistently expressed their believe that not every Christian receives that gift (or any one gift, for that matter). Clement of Alexandria explains that “each [believer] has his own proper gift of God -- one in one way, another in another.” Hippolytus is even more explicit: “It is not necessary that every one of the faithful should cast out demons, raise the dead, or speak with tongues. But only such a one who has been graciously given the gift -- for the purpose that it may be advantageous to the salvation of unbelievers.” Ambrose echoes, “Not all, says he, have the gift of healings, nor do all, says he, speak with tongues. For the whole of the divine gifts cannot exist in each several man.” And Chrysostom, Jerome, Augustine, and Theodoret of Cyrus agree. The chorus of evidence is overwhelming. The church fathers did not believe that every believer received the same spiritual endowment from the Holy Spirit. Some were gifted with tongues while others were gifted in other ways." Nathan Busenitz, "The Gift of Tongues: Comparing the Church Fathers with Contemporary Pentecostalism", Ref-0167 Volume 17 Number 1, Spring 2006, 61:78, p. 64.


tongues - not understandable : 1Cor. 14:15
tongues - occult use : pythoness - tongues
tongues - pray in : 1Cor. 14:15
tongues - praying in Spirit? : Holy Spirit - intercedes
tongues - sign to unbelievers : Gen. 11:7-9; Deu. 28:49-50; Isa. 28:11; Isa. 33:19; Jer. 5:15; Eze. 3:5-6; Mark 16:17; Mark 16:20; Acts 2:11; Acts 10:44-46; Acts 11:15-18; Acts 19:6; 1Cor. 14:21-22

"There are verses in 1 Corinthians 14 where foreign language makes sense but where unintelligible ecstatic utterance does not [1Cor. 14:22]. However the reverse cannot be said." Ref-0115, p. 147. God employed foreign languages (which were not understood) to ‘speak’ to Israel in judgment -- since they would not listen to their own prophets speaking their native tongue He would ‘speak to them’ through the actions of foreign nations whose actions they would listen to.


tongues - singing in : 1Cor. 14:15
tongues - speaking mysteries to God : 1Cor. 14:2; 1Cor. 14:28
tongues - spoken : Acts 2:4; Acts 8:17 (?); Acts 10:46; Acts 19:6; 1Cor. 14:2-39

"The occurrence of dialektos, ‘language,’ in Acts 2 but not in 1 Corinthians 14 does not imply as some argue that the tongues of Corinthians differ from those in Acts. This word does not occur in Acts 10 or 19, yet these tongues are definitely the same as those in Acts 2." Ref-0115, p. 149. "Apparently, when the apostles laid hands on the new believers in Samaria, there was some visible manifestation of the Holy Spirit's coming to that person. In all likelihood, the Samaritan converts spoke in tongues miraculously . . . just as the first believers at Pentecost had. The outpouring of languages would have been a clear sign that the Samaritans were receiving the same Holy Spirit on the same terms as the original Jewish believers, lest there be a division in the church. When Simon witnessed such a wondrous sign, he desperately wanted the power to perform the miracle at will." Ref-0789, pp. 66-67. Questionable: Acts 8:17 (?);


tongues - to cease : cessationism
tongues - to God : Acts 2:4
tongues - two or three : 1Cor. 14:27
tongues - unknown languages? : 1Cor. 13:1; 1Cor. 14:14; 2Cor. 12:4

✪ See tongues - known languages. "If the expression ‘tongues of men and angels’ (1Cor. 13:1) be appealed to [as an indication that tongues were ecstatic in nature], it is sufficient to note that the first three verses of the chapter have a pronounced hyperbolic character. While angels no doubt have languages of their own, the apostle no more implies that he expects the readers to use them than that he expects them to give their bodies to be burned (v. 3)." Zane C. Hodges, "The Purpose of Tongues," Ref-0200, 120 (July-September 1963): 231, cited in Ref-0115, p. 137. "The apostle no more implies that he himself spoke angel languages than he implies that he knew all mysteries and all knowledge and had given his body to be burned." Ref-0115, endnote 64, p. 160. "As one has noted, “The condition ἐὰν λαλῶ is of the third class, a supposable case,” or as another states, “ἐὰν λαλῶ supposes a case which never has been exemplified: ‘even if I can speak,’ or as E.V. ‘thought I speak.’” As Meyers puts it, “It supposes something, that actual existence of which is left dependent on the circumstances: assuming it to be the case, that I speak, etc . . . The tongues of angels here spoken are certainly only an abstract conception.”" Donald G. McDougall, "Cessationism in 1_Cor_13:8-12", Ref-0164, 14/2 (Fall 2003) 177-213, p. 194. "If one insists on taking the phrase “tongues . . . of angels” as a reference to the languages of heaven, it is important to note that whenever angels spoke in the Bible, they spoke in a real language that people could understand (cf. Gen 19; Exod 33; Joshua 5; Judges 13). Consequently, this phrase does not support the notion of non-cognitive speech." Nathan A. Busenitz, Are Tongues Real Foreign Languages? A Response to Four Continuationist Arguments, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 63-84, p. 79. "until the charismatic movement found it necessary to explain why modern glossolalia bears no relationship to any known language, no one ever suggested that the language spoken by angels might lack structure or sense. No credible commentator ever thought the “groanings which cannot be uttered” spoken of in Rom 8:26 can actually be uttered in repetitive nonsense syllables." John MacArthur, Strange Fire Redux, Ref-0164 25(2) Fall 2004, 85-93, p. 90.


tooling : tooling - Solomon's temple - offsite
tooling - Solomon's temple - offsite : 1K. 6:7
tools : hands - made without; wood - firewood from tools
tools - for firewood : wood - firewood from tools
tools - made without : hands - made without
tooth : eye - for eye
tooth - for tooth : eye - for eye
Tophet : Tophet - child sacrifice
Tophet - child sacrifice : 2K. 23:10; Isa. 30:33; Jer. 7:31-32; Jer. 19:6; Jer. 19:11-14

"The open air sanctuary was known as the Tophet, which is typically translated as “roaster” or “place of burning.” Modern scholars have given the name tophet to places where they believe child sacrifice took place around the Mediterranean rim, mostly [sic.] famously at Carthage. We believe it is apparent that the Phoenicians brought this barbaric practice to Carthage from Canaan, and therefore, evidence of child sacrifice at Carthage provides support for the historicity of the biblical accounts which mention such sacrifices. Even though Carthage is geographically removed from Canaan (approximately 1400 mi distant), it is not religiously or ancestrally removed." Henry B. Smith, Jr., Redeeming the Carthaginians?, Ref-0066, Vol. 25 No. 1 Winter 2012, 4-12, p. 4. ". . . in the Tophet of Carthage the majority of the infants died between one and one and a half months. . . . The age profile of the Tophet infants is markedly different from that expected in the case of death from natural causes. . . . under the stelae are urns containing the burnt remains of the children. In particular, there is a certain Semitic inscription, mlk, which has a very close connection to the OT. . . . Based on epigraphical studies by Paul Mosca, these Semitic inscriptions have been translated as mulk. Stager explains: “Mulk is a technical word in Semitic for a live sacrifice fulfillment of a Tophet vow, just as other Semitic words are used to indicate cereal offerings and other kinds of animal sacrifices." Henry B. Smith, Jr., Redeeming the Carthaginians?, Ref-0066, Vol. 25 No. 1 Winter 2012, 4-12, pp. 7-8 "[Carthage] is the largest sacrificial cemetery ever found, measuring at least 60,000 square feet. Most stunning is the number of children sacrificed here--estimated at a minimum of 20,000 burials between 400-200 B.C. during only one-third the life of the cemetery!" John Currid, Abortion: Child Sacrifice Today?, Ref-0066, Vol. 25 No. 1 Winter 2012, 13-15, p. 13.


topical : preaching - topical
topical - preaching : preaching - topical
Torah : fencing - Torah ; law - Moses wrote; legalism - fencing ; Moses - Torah - author ; STaM - acronym

✪ From Hebrew "tora" = law. The first five books of the Hebrew Scriptures (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy.) Also know by Gentiles as the Pentateuch. "Torah, which is often translated ‘law,’ has, of course, a far greater compass than the sum of certain rules or regulations. The verbal root from which the noun is formed means ‘to shoot,’ that is, to mark the direction pointed out by an arrow. Torah thus combines elements of revelation and teaching of which legislation forms only a part. Torah means the total directive will of God as exhibited in creation, history, redemption, and the uttered word of judgment and salvation. It includes grace and law." Ref-0023, p. 172.


Torah - fencing : fencing - Torah ; legalism - fencing
Torah - Mosaic authorship : Moses - Torah - author
Torah - Moses wrote : law - Moses wrote
Torah - STaM acronym : STaM - acronym
torch : covenant - Abrahamic - witnesses
torch - oven - witnesses : covenant - Abrahamic - witnesses
torment : lake of fire - torment
torment - lake of fire : lake of fire - torment
torn : garment - torn; veil - torn in two; wounded - and healed by God
torn - by God : wounded - and healed by God
torn - garment : garment - torn
torn - veil : veil - torn in two
Torrey, A Treasury of Great Preaching : Ref-0988
Torrey, A Treasury of Great Preaching - A Treasury of Great Preaching, Torrey : Ref-0988
Torrey, A Treasury of Great Preaching - A Treasury of Great Preaching, Torrey - Cross-0059 : Ref-0988
Torrey, A Treasury of Great Preaching - Cross-0059 : Ref-0988
Torrey, R. (1995, c1897). The new topical text book : A scriptural text book for the use of ministers, teachers, and all Christian workers. Oak Harbor, WA: Logos research Systems, Inc. : Ref-0628
Torrey, R. (1995, c1897). The new topical text book : A scriptural text book for the use of ministers, teachers, and all Christian workers. Oak Harbor, WA: Logos research Systems, Inc. - Logos-0388 : Ref-0628
Torrey, R. A., The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth : Ref-0929
Torrey, R. A., The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth - SS-0043 : Ref-0929
Torrey, R. A., The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth - SS-0043 - The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth, R. A. Torrey : Ref-0929
Torrey, R. A., The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth - The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth, R. A. Torrey : Ref-0929
Torry, How To Pray : Ref-1073
Torry, How To Pray - Cross-0144 : Ref-1073
Torry, How To Pray - Cross-0144 - How To Pray, Torry : Ref-1073
Torry, How To Pray - How To Pray, Torry : Ref-1073
Torry, New Topical Textbook : Ref-1074
Torry, New Topical Textbook - Cross-0145 : Ref-1074
Torry, New Topical Textbook - Cross-0145 - New Topical Textbook, Torry : Ref-1074
Torry, New Topical Textbook - New Topical Textbook, Torry : Ref-1074
Torry, R. A., What the Bible Teaches : Ref-0703
Torry, R. A., What the Bible Teaches - Logos-0454 : Ref-0703
Torry, R. A., What the Bible Teaches - Logos-0454 - What the Bible Teaches, R. A. Torry : Ref-0703
Torry, R. A., What the Bible Teaches - What the Bible Teaches, R. A. Torry : Ref-0703
Torry, Revival Addresses : Ref-1075
Torry, Revival Addresses - Cross-0146 : Ref-1075
Torry, Revival Addresses - Cross-0146 - Revival Addresses, Torry : Ref-1075
Torry, Revival Addresses - Revival Addresses, Torry : Ref-1075
total : depravity - total
total - depravity : depravity - total
total depravity : dead - spiritually ; dead - spiritually - Canons of Dort
total depravity - Canons of Dort : dead - spiritually - Canons of Dort
totem poles : idols - wooden cut down
totem poles - worship : idols - wooden cut down
totems : idolatry - judge by destruction; totems - AGAINST
totems - AGAINST : Deu. 4:16; Deu. 5:8; Deu. 7:5; Deu. 12:13; Rom. 1:23

"Today, it is common for pictorial documentation to focus on the imagery of house-post and totem carvings as if they date back through centuries of evolution. Yet Curtis suggested that their introduction to the Kwakiutl village was as recent as the 19th century." Ref-1407, p. 86.


totems - destroy : idolatry - judge by destruction
touch : touch - restores strength
touch - restores strength : Dan. 8:18; Mat. 17:7; Mat. 9:21; Mark 5:28; Luke 5:19; Luke 8:44
touched : unclean - touched - Jesus
touched - unclean - Jesus : unclean - touched - Jesus
Touchie, Rodger D., Edward S. Curtis: Above the Medicine Line : Ref-1407
Touchie, Rodger D., Edward S. Curtis: Above the Medicine Line - Portraits of Aboriginal Life in the Canadian West : Ref-1407
touching : dead - touching unclean; touching - holy things; touching - Jesus after resurrection
touching - dead - unclean : dead - touching unclean
touching - holy things : Lev. 10:2; Num. 4:15-20; 1S. 6:19; 1Chr. 13:10
touching - Jesus after resurrection : John 20:17; John 20:27

"Why did Jesus forbid Mary Magdalene to touch Him [John 20:17], when, later, He permitted the Apostle Thomas to touch Him [John 20:27]? 1. Two different Greek words are used to indicate touch [KJV]. The Greek word in verse 17 means to cling or to take hold. The Greek word in verse 27 means merely laying a hand onto someone else's skin. Since it was necessary for Jesus to leave the earth now that the earthly ministry of His first coming was completed, Mary was not to cling to Him to prevent Him from leaving. 2. Hebrews 9 explains that Christ was to enter the Heavenly Sanctuary as high priest and offer His own blood (Heb. 9:12, Heb. 10:12) to cleanse the heavenly things (Heb. 9:23-24)." Ref-0067


Toussaint, Stanley D. Behold The King : Ref-0143
Toussaint, Stanley D. Behold The King - Behold The King : Ref-0143
Tov, E., & Computer Assisted Tools for Septuagint Studies. (2003). The parallel aligned Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek texts of Jewish scripture : Ref-0629
Tov, E., & Computer Assisted Tools for Septuagint Studies. (2003). The parallel aligned Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek texts of Jewish scripture - Alexandrinus and Theodotion variants. Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc. : Ref-0629
Tov, E., & Computer Assisted Tools for Septuagint Studies. (2003). The parallel aligned Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek texts of Jewish Scripture. Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc. : Ref-0630
Tov, E., & Computer Assisted Tools for Septuagint Studies. (2003). The parallel aligned Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek texts of Jewish Scripture. Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc. - Logos-0390 : Ref-0630
Tov, Emmanuel, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible : Ref-0954
Tov, Emmanuel, Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible - Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, Emmanuel Tov : Ref-0954
Tower of Babel : Babel - dispersion
Tower of Babel - dispersion : Babel - dispersion
Tozer on the Holy Spirit : Ref-0109
Tozer on the Holy Spirit - Tozer, Aiden Wilson. Tozer on the Holy Spirit : Ref-0109
Tozer, Aiden Wilson. Tozer on the Holy Spirit : Ref-0109
Tozer, Aiden Wilson. Tozer on the Holy Spirit - Tozer on the Holy Spirit : Ref-0109

TO