© 2004 Tony Garland - contact@SpiritAndTruth.org
"Is there
unrighteousness with God?"
Paul anticipates
our line of thinking. God's right to choose seems unjust from
our perspective. We elevate our own ideas of justice above God's
electing purposes and divine sovereignty. This tendency of man to
question his Maker is illustrated in Job ( Job 40:7-8 ) .
"Certainly not!"
The
Greek phrase is me GEnoito , "not it should become!"
The optative mood stands apart from the conditional clause to
express the strongest possible wish regarding an event. Other
examples of this usage include: Rom. 3:4 ; 6:2 ; 11:1
; 1Cor. 6:15 .
"I will have mercy on whomever
I will have mercy"
The setting is God's
revelation of His character to Moses ( Ex. 33:18 ) . This statement is connected with God revealing His
glory (honor, splendor, reputation) and his mercy
(undeserved favor). His favor is extended according to His
sovereignty and purpose.
"not of him who wills, nor of
him who runs"
His favor is not according to
the will or decision of man, nor does it depend upon human exertion
(works). Those who do exhibit works favorable to God only do
so by His empowerment ( Php. 2:12 ) , having already been the recipients of His choosing.
"but of God who shows mercy"
His mercy is extended according to His sovereign
purpose, to achieve His desired outcome ( John 1:11-13 ) .
"I have raised you up"
Pharaoh was only Pharaoh because God had placed
him there for His purpose. It is God who appoints kings ( Pr. 21:1 ; Isa. 44:28
; Dan. 4:32 ; Rev. 17:17 ).
"that I may show My power in
you"
"Might show" is enDEIKnumi
: "to give outward proof, demonstrate." Power ( Gen. 9:16 ) is Kochiy , "the working power of Me:" a
visible manifestation of God's power through the life of Pharaoh.
"that my name may be declared
in all the earth"
God's sovereign favor and
determination are not arbitrary. Nor does His choosing of
individuals indicate they are inherently better than others. His
actions are for His own sake -- to reveal His glory and
character. What God is doing with Israel is not about Israel,
but about God!
"whom He wills He hardens"
Having a sinful nature, we have a tendency to
harden our own hearts ( Ps. 95:7-11 ) .
Pharaoh's Hardening
God predicts He will harden Pharaoh's heart ( Ex. 4:21 ; 7:3 ) .
Pharaoh is said to harden his own heart ( Ex. 7:13 ; 8:15 , 19 , 32 ).
The LORD hardened Pharaoh's heart ( Ex. 9:12 ) .
Pharaoh hardened his own heart ( Ex. 9:34 )
The LORD hardens Pharaoh's heart ( Ex. 10:1 , 20 , 27 ; 11:10 ).
Other passages where God hardens hearts.
Sihon, king of Heshbon ( 2:30 ) .
Cities of the promised land ( Jos. 11:19-20 ) .
Men of Israel ( Isa. 63:17 ) .
Sovereignty and Judgment
When
numerous passages are taken into account, there is both a sovereign
aspect where God initiates hardening and a judicial aspect
where God responds by hardening (e.g., Rom. 1:24-32 ; Rom. 11:5-8 ).
"You will say to me then"
Paul anticipates our tendency to: (1) judge God;
(2) elevate our puny logic over God's wisdom; (3) require an answer
from God for His actions (like Job). Here we meet again with the
tension between divine sovereignty and human
responsibility ("free will"). The
Bible teaches both which we are unable to fully reconcile (
Mat. 26:24 ; Acts 2:22-24 ; 4:27-28
).
Sovereign vs. Judicial Hardening
Take note! If God's hardening is always judicial
(in response to man's initial rejection) then this verse is
unnecessary for no accusation would be made. Furthermore, man's
response would be determinative of history rather than God's
predestined purpose.
A Dog and his Tail
The
bottom line will always be this: Does the tail wag the dog or the
dog wag its tail? Wherever we minimize God's sovereignty and
elevate man's "freedom," we will have the "tail
wagging the dog" and the creature is indirectly determining
the actions of the Creator. God is no longer sovereign.
"who are you to reply . . ?"
"To reply" is antopoKRINomai ,
anta = "against," + apo = "away from,"
+ krinō = "to judge." Who is man that he
should talk back or contradict
God ( Job 40:2-5
) ?!
"the thing formed say to him
who formed it"
Paul emphasizes the Creator
vs. creature distinction. "Thing formed" is PLASma
from PLASSō from which we get our word "plastic"
. It is something which can be formed or molded by an external
agent.
"Why have you made me like
this?"
Why does the Creator create?
Because He has a purpose! The thing
created does not impose its own purpose upon the Creator--the pot
exists only by the potter's initiative. This phrase recalls several
Old Testament passages emphasizing God's sovereignty over His
creation, especially mankind ( Isa. 29:15 ; 45:9-11
; 64:8 ).
"the potter . . . the clay?"
The larger context of this passage is reinforced
by the Old Testament context regarding the potter and the
clay . These typically refer to God and Israel
( Isa. 29:1 ;
45:11 ; 64:8-11
; Lam. 4:2 ; Jer. 18:1-6 ). Remember that Paul is still speaking about Israel
and her failure to accept Messiah, although the principles of
sovereign election apply to all men ( Rom. 9:24 ) .
"Does not the potter have power
over the clay"
"Power over" is
exouSIa , "the right to act decide, or dispose of one's
property as one wishes," a technical term, especially in wills.
"the same lump"
"Lump"
is fuRAmatos , "that which is mixed or kneaded" (
from furAō ). The raw materials are uniformly mixed -
the same. This is analogous to the "by one man" (one
sexual union) in verse 10 . The difference is not found in the clay itself, but
in the purpose of the potter. All of the clay is sinful and
deserving of judgment and inclined away from God. None of the clay
would choose God without His calling ( John 6:37-39 , 64-66
).
"wanting
to show . . . to make known"
God's election
and sovereign purpose is intended to demonstrate:
His wrath and power,
His riches of glory and power.
These are both aspects of His character. When we minimize one or the other, we are guilty of misrepresenting Him and presenting a caricature of God.
"wrath"
Wrath
is the divine reaction toward evil. God's wrath has two primary
aspects. He has an ongoing wrath which abides on those who
reject Him ( John 3:36
) , and there is a specific future time where God's wrath will be
exhibited toward the ungodly (e.g., Rev. 6:15-17 )
"endured with longsuffering"
"The withholding of His grace from the
non-elect is but the negative cause of their perishing, just as the
absence of a physician from the sick man is the occasion, not the
efficient cause, of his death." Loraine Boettner,
The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, 115.
"vessels
of wrath prepared for destruction"
"Prepared"
is katērtisMENa , a perfect passive participle. Although
it is conceivable the form is middle-voice (the vessels participated
in their own preparation), the preponderance of evidence favors the
passive form:
Katartizō is nowhere else used in the NT as a direct or reflexive middle. When coupled with the perfect tense, the verb implies something which is a "done deal" and that the vessels do not dynamically change their state over time.
The potter vs. clay motif is most naturally understood in a way where the potter is completely sovereign over the clay--the clay does not form itself, nor determine the potter's use.
Paul has specifically excluded the idea that God's election is dependent upon the actions or will of the individual ( Rom. 9:11 ) .
"The LORD has made all for Himself, Yes, even the wicked for the day of doom" ( Pr. 16:4 ) . Yet, God is not the Author of evil! He desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of truth ( Eze. 18:23 ; 1Ti. 2:4 ; 2Pe. 3:9 ).
What about the Angels?
The idea that God does not predestine all men
equally to salvation is repugnant to some Christians. But what about
fallen angels? Scripture records no possibility that any of
the fallen angels may be redeemed. Why can we accept this fact with
hardly any comment, yet stumble on the teaching of election
concerning man? Could it be we are happy to support God's
sovereignty so long as it doesn't involve us?
"vessels of mercy prepared
beforehand"
"I will have mercy on
whomever I will have mercy" ( Ex. 33:18 ) . God is demonstrating in history what He showed
Moses -- His reputation and character.
"He prepared beforehand"
"He prepared beforehand" is proēTOImasen
, used only of God's work in the NT. Pro = "before"
+ hetoiMAzō ="to prepare." Those prepared
beforehand are those who are called and predestined ( Rom. 8:30 ) .
"even us whom he called"
A different verb for preparation is used than for
the vessels of wrath. This verb explicitly emphasizes the previous
preparation in time past whereas the other is implied by the perfect
tense. This verb is related to "predestine" prooRIzō
. This verb emphasizes the means whereas "predestine"
emphasizes the end (purpose).
|
|
||||