The Coming Kingdom - Part 43
� 2015 Andy Woods
In this series, the biblical teaching on the kingdom has
been surveyed to demonstrate that Scripture conveys that the kingdom is a
future reality. Moreover, equating the church with the Messianic kingdom
radically alters God's design for the church.
Another area of monumental change occurs in the life of
the church when it embraces "kingdom now" theology. As explained in
the prior installment, this area relates to embracing hyper-Pentecostalism,
which contends that signs and wonders are an absolute necessity in order to
effectively evangelize. This approach is sometimes referred to as "power
of evangelism." Hyper-Pentecostalism is rooted in "kingdom now"
theology. The reason for this nexus between the kingdom and signs and wonders
is because the kingdom will be a time of unprecedented miracles (Isa. 35:5-6).
If the kingdom, a predicted time of unprecedented miracles, is now a present
reality, then so should be the present age.
Interestingly, the late John Wimber, a leading advocate of
power evangelism, was heavily influenced by "kingdom now" theology.
Wimber derived much of his views of the kingdom from the writings of George
Eldon Ladd. Ladd taught a view called "Historic Premillennialism,"
which stands for the proposition that the kingdom is "already but not
yet." While contending that some form of the earthly kingdom will ultimately
come in the future millennial reign of Christ, the kingdom had also already
been inaugurated in spiritual form in the present age. Ladd maintained that
Jesus was currently seated on David's Throne in heaven orchestrating this
present spiritual form of the kingdom. Wimber was explicit in linking his
belief in modern-day signs and wonders to a present manifestation of the
kingdom in his book Power Evangelism:
I was already acquainted with George Eldon Ladd's writings
(he was a Fuller Theological Seminary professor), but it was not until I read
his book Jesus and the Kingdom that I realized his work on the kingdom
formed a theological basis for power evangelism. As I read Dr. Ladd's books,
and read afresh the gospel accounts, I became convinced that power evangelism
was for today.[1]
Progressive Dispensationalists have also embraced a
similar "already but not yet" view of the kingdom. Interestingly,
many Progressive Dispensationalists who have adopted an "already not
yet" view of the kingdom have also moved gradually in the direction of
Pentecostalism. For example, in a book examining the issue of the perpetuity of
spiritual gifts entitled Are Miraculous
Gifts for Today?, leading Progressive Dispensationalist Robert Saucy opened
the door to Pentecostal Theology in a chapter entitled An Open But Cautious View?[2]
Other flirtations by Progressive Dispensationalists with charismatic theology
can also be cited.[3]
Thus, the nexus between the kingdom now theology and modern-day signs and
wonders has caused Ryrie to inquire how Progressive Dispensationalism and
Cessationism are intellectually consistent and compatible. He asks:
Non-charismatic progressive
dispensationalists have not faced the question as to why signs and wonders are
not characteristic of the church if in fact Christ is already on David's
throne. During our Lord's earthly life many signs validated His claim to be the
promised Davidic king for Israel. Now that He is allegedly reigning as Davidic
King (according to progressives), why are there not miraculous signs happening
today in the "already" stage of his Davidic reign?[4]
In actuality, the present age cannot be characterized as
the kingdom for the simple reason that the wide-scale signs and wonders predicted
for the kingdom are not a present manifestation. While not disputing the fact
that God can and frequently does intervene providentially and miraculously in
His creation at times (Jas. 5:14-16), these random occurrences do not
correspond to the widespread miracles that will come to the world once the
kingdom arrives. Interestingly, although Paul performed many miraculous signs
throughout His ministry (Acts 14:8-12; 20:7-12), the New Testament also
testifies to a gradual waning of the miracles performed through Paul as his
ministry was coming to a conclusion. In 2 Timothy, his final letter, he wrote,
"...but Trophimus I left sick at Miletus" (2 Tim. 4:20). Church
history also seems to testify of the cessation of certain New Testament gifts.
Notice Chrysostom's (A.D.
345‒407) commentary on First Corinthians 12, which is a key chapter
dealing with the gifts of the Holy Spirit:
This whole place is very obscure: but the obscurity is
produced by our ignorance of the facts
referred to and by their cessation, being such as then used to occur but now no
longer take place. And why do they not happen now? Why look now, the cause too of the obscurity has produced us
again another question: namely, why did they then happen, and now do so no
more?[5]
Notice also Augustine's (A.D. 354‒430) remarks regarding the cessation of
the sign gifts:
In the earliest times, the Holy Ghost fell upon them that believed:
and they spoke with tongues, which they had not learned, as the Spirit gave them
utterance. Acts 2:4 These were signs adapted to the time. For there
behooved to be that betokening of the Holy Spirit in all tongues, to show that the Gospel of
God was to run through all tongues over the whole earth. That thing was done
for a betokening, and it passed away...If then the witness
of the presence of the Holy Ghost be not now given through these miracles,
by what is it given, by what does one get to know that
he has received the Holy Ghost?[6]
If the cessation of certain gifts of the Spirit in the
life of the church is indeed a reality, then the kingdom, a predicted era of
miracles, cannot be confused with the present age. Yet, "kingdom now"
theology alters this blueprint and in the process introduces
hyper-Pentecostalism into the modern church.
Yet another errant view so predominant in the modern
church and on so called "Christian" television is known as the
"Prosperity Gospel." According to this theological perspective, the believer,
as the child of the king, is entitled to a life of health and wealth. Thus, if
a believer finds himself or herself in a state of financial poverty or physical
illness it is because they either do not have enough spiritual knowledge or
faith to claim their biblical promises of health and wealth or they have not
accessed the various divine verbal laws necessary to speak these realties into
personal existence.[7]
The Prosperity Gospel represents yet another theological error that finds its
roots in "kingdom now" theology. Like the connection to "power
evangelism," the relationship between the presence of the kingdom and the
promise of health and wealth is easy to understand. The Bible notes the kingdom
will be a time of unprecedented healing (Isa. 35:5-6). In
addition to universal healing, the kingdom will also epitomize an era of
unprecedented material abundance. Amos 9:13-14 predicts that the "...the
plowman will overtake the reaper and the treader of
grapes him who sows seed; when the mountains will drip
sweet wine...My people...will also plant vineyards and
drink their wine, and make gardens and eat their
fruit." Thus, if the kingdom is indeed a present, spiritual reality as
maintained by "kingdom now" theologians, then inevitable healing and
worldly riches should also be now accessible to every child of God. D.R.
McConnell, in his critique of the Prosperity Gospel, well explains the
dependency of this false teaching upon "kingdom now" theology.
...The Faith teachers deny that the kingdom of God is in the process of realization, claiming that it is present in the earth to the point that believers can be delivered from all sin, sickness, and poverty of the devil. They...claim that the believer has absolute authority to conquer and eradicate these forces of evil completely from his life. The only process of realization is in the faith of the believer, not in the presence of God's kingdom. In the jargon of biblical theology, the Faith interpretation of the kingdom of God could be labeled as a "hyper-realized" eschatology. The Faith eschatology is "hyper realized" because of its extreme promises to the believer of a life which is absolutely invulnerable to any type of evil. It claims "that the powers of the age to come" have completely come in this life and that these powers can be used at will by the believer with enough faith and knowledge of how to operate them. There is no process of realization of God's kingdom in Faith eschatology; the kingdom can be completely realized in the lives of those who exercise Faith principles. We see this hyper-realized eschatology in the Faith doctrines of healing, authority, prosperity, identification and deification. The over realized nature of Faith eschatology emphasizes the "Now" of the kingdom of God...The... "Not yet" mystery of the kingdom and its powers is distorted by the hyper-realized eschatology of the Faith movement.[8]
In actuality, the present age cannot be characterized as
the kingdom since New Testament heroes, such as the Apostle Paul, did not enjoy
lives of unlimited heath and wealth. Paul suffered from frequent illnesses
(Gal. 4:13) and learned to be content both in financial abundance and material
scarcity (Phil. 4:12). Illness as well as poverty can be identified in other
godly New Testament examples such as Timothy (1 Tim. 5:23), the Macedonians (2
Cor. 8:2-3), and the Church at Smyrna (Rev. 2:9). If poverty and illness can be
a reality in the life of the Christian, then the kingdom, a predicted era of
health and wealth, cannot be confused with the present age. Yet, "kingdom now"
theology alters this blueprint and in the process introduces the false theology
of the Prosperity Gospel into the modern church.
A final area of ecclesiastical change as a consequence of
embracing "kingdom now" theology pertains to the advent of
anti-Israelism within the church. When the church views itself as the kingdom
of God on the earth, it has a tendency to become either apathetic about or even
belligerent toward the notion that God will one day establish His future
kingdom upon the earth through His work with the nation of Israel. After all,
why be concerned about a future kingdom that will come to the earth through the
Jew if we are in a spiritual form of the kingdom now and the church has become
the new, spiritual Israel. Alva J. McClain notes, "The confusion of our
Lord's rule...leads to serious consequences...it makes the present age the
period of the Mediatorial Kingdom...it dissolves the divinely covenanted
purpose in the nation of Israel."[9]
Thus, it comes as no surprise to discover that the
teachings of "kingdom now" theologians are replete with anti-Israel
sentiments not only against God's future work through Israel but also toward
His precursor to this work as represented by the existence of the modern state
of Israel. For example, Gary DeMar expresses such "kingdom now"
sentiments when he says, "God has not called us to forsake the earth, but
to impress heaven's pattern on earth."[10]
He similarly notes, "Christians must be obedient to the mandate God has
given to extend His kingdom to every sphere of life, to every corner of the
globe (Gen 1:26-28; Matt 28:18-20)." Yet just as clear, or perhaps even
clearer, than his "kingdom now" theology is DeMar's anti-Israel
mentality, when he proclaims:
Where is this "super
sign" found in the Bible? Not in the New Testament. There is not a single
verse in the entire New Testament that says anything about Israel becoming a
nation again. Nothing prophetic in the New Testament depends on Israel becoming
a nation again. If Israel becoming a nation again is such "a significant
sign," then why doesn't the New Testament specifically mention it?[11]
We find this identical pattern in the teachings of "kingdom now" theologian Gary North. North notes, "The goal of establishing Christ's international kingdom can be presented to citizens of any nation." Elsewhere North observes, "Christians are required to become active in the building God's visible kingdom." He similarly explains, "If the Christian church fails to build the visible kingdom by means of biblical law and the power of the gospel, despite the resurrection of Christ and the presence of the Holy Spirit, then what kind of religion are we preaching?" North also teaches, "The parable (Matt 13:24-30, 36-43) refers to the building of the kingdom of God, not simply to the institutional church." As is the case with Gary DeMar, the anti-Israel sentiment is just as clear in the teachings of Gary North as is his "kingdom now" belief system. Thomas Ice reports, "Gary North has boasted that he has a book already in his computer for when 'Israel gets pushed into the sea, or converted to Christ.'"[12] This disturbing pattern makes it quite apparent that the church runs the risk of becoming progressively more anti-Israel, both in its sentiment toward a future kingdom through Israel as well as toward the modern state of Israel, the further she experiences an ecclesiastical drift into "kingdom now" theology. All things considered, "kingdom now" theology has a deleterious impact on the perspective, purpose, mission, and life of the church in very real, tangible, and practical ways.
�As promised at the
onset, due to the dominance of "kingdom now" theology in modern
evangelical thought, we have completed a lengthy series on the subject of the kingdom. First, the biblical teaching on the
kingdom of God has been surveyed from Genesis to Revelation. Second, this series set forth some
general problems with a New Testament based "kingdom now"
interpretation. Third, this series
examined the isolated New Testament texts that "kingdom now"
theologians use in order to demonstrate their insufficiency to convey "kingdom
now" theology. Fourth, this
series noted why the trend of equating God's present work in the church[13]
with the messianic kingdom is a matter believers should be concerned about
since this theology radically alters God's design for the church. My hope and
prayer is that God will use this series, and other like-minded resources, to
strengthen God's people to stand against the pernicious tide of "kingdom
now" theology that is so prevalent in our day.
(End of Series)
[1] John Wimber and Kevin Springer, Power
Evangelism, Rev. ed. (Minn.: Baker, 2009), 19.
[2] Robert L. Saucy, "An Open but Cautious View," in Are Miraculous Gifts for Today: Four Views,
ed. Stanley N. Gundry(Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), 97-148.
[3] Dan Wallace, �The
Uneasy Conscience of a Non-Charismatic Evangelical,� online: https://bible.org/article/uneasy-conscience-non-charismatic-evangelical,
1994, accessed 04 September 2015.
[4] Charles Ryrie, Dispensationalism,
rev ed. (Chicago: Moody, 1995), 177.
[5] Chrysostom, Homily 29 on First
Corinthians. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/220129.htm.
[6] Augustine, Homily
6:10 on the First Epistle of John. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/170206.htm.
[7] For a book-length
critique of the "Prosperity Gospel," see Michael Horton, ed. The Agony of
Deceit: What Some Teachers Are Really Teaching (Chicago: Moody, 1990).
[8] D.R. McConnell, A Different Gospel:
A Bold and Revealing Look at the Historical Basis of the Word of Faith Movement,
Updated and electronic ed. (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2011), loc. 4813-4846.
[9] Alva J. McClain, The Greatness of
the Kingdom; an Inductive Study of the Kingdom of God as Set Forth in the
Scriptures (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1959), 438.
[10] The following quotes
(and sourcing) from various "kingdom now" theologians, such as Gary
DeMar and Gary North, can be found in H. Wayne House and Thomas Ice, Dominion
Theology: Blessing or Curse? (Portland, OR: Multnomah, 1988), 409-11.
[11] Gary DeMar, End Times Fiction: A
Biblical Consideration of the Left Behind Theology (Nashville, TN: Nelson,
2001), 203.
[12] Personal letter
from Gary North to Peter Lalonde, April 30, 1987 on file; cited in Thomas Ice,
�Answering Those Who Oppose Israel,� online: www.pre-trib.org,
accessed 21 October 2015, 1.
(Source: SpiritAndTruth.org)